Comments on: Bricolage 1.10.0 is Out! http://blog.centopeia.com/2006/01/24/bricolage-1100-is-out/ Ramblings about digital life Tue, 07 Oct 2008 20:05:37 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: ENGRENAGEM - Media e Tecnologia: blog sobre jornalismo, citizen journalism, blogosfera e novas tecnologias http://blog.centopeia.com/2006/01/24/bricolage-1100-is-out/#comment-693 ENGRENAGEM - Media e Tecnologia: blog sobre jornalismo, citizen journalism, blogosfera e novas tecnologias Sat, 28 Jan 2006 18:37:11 +0000 http://blog.centopeia.com/?p=68#comment-693 [...] Bricolage 1.10.0 is Out! [...] [...] Bricolage 1.10.0 is Out! [...]

]]> By: Pedro http://blog.centopeia.com/2006/01/24/bricolage-1100-is-out/#comment-690 Pedro Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:23:39 +0000 http://blog.centopeia.com/?p=68#comment-690 Well, Bricolage pretty much on any distribution you might want, but I'll recomend you to use Debian or Fedora, since those are the ones I've installed it before without major hassles. Well, Bricolage pretty much on any distribution you might want, but I’ll recomend you to use Debian or Fedora, since those are the ones I’ve installed it before without major hassles.

]]> By: Visitante X http://blog.centopeia.com/2006/01/24/bricolage-1100-is-out/#comment-689 Visitante X Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:16:56 +0000 http://blog.centopeia.com/?p=68#comment-689 Hello! Can you recommend a good Linux distribution for me to install at home, to make a testbed for a Bricolage System? I have already read the requirements, but I'm in doubt which Linux distro is the best. Hello!
Can you recommend a good Linux distribution for me to install at home, to make a testbed for a Bricolage System? I have already read the requirements, but I’m in doubt which Linux distro is the best.

]]> By: Gothic http://blog.centopeia.com/2006/01/24/bricolage-1100-is-out/#comment-687 Gothic Tue, 24 Jan 2006 21:17:00 +0000 http://blog.centopeia.com/?p=68#comment-687 Another example: http://www.google.pt/robots.txt: Maybe in the standard mode, all the search engines will index it! =) Another example: http://www.google.pt/robots.txt:

Maybe in the standard mode, all the search engines will index it! =)

]]> By: Pedro http://blog.centopeia.com/2006/01/24/bricolage-1100-is-out/#comment-686 Pedro Tue, 24 Jan 2006 15:51:31 +0000 http://blog.centopeia.com/?p=68#comment-686 Which part of an advise you want me to follow: <blockquote> User-Agent: * Although commands are not case sensitive, <strong>we advise</strong> you to write exactly "User-agent", that is all lowercase except for the capitalized "U".</blockquote> I rest my case! hein? Which part of an advise you want me to follow:

User-Agent: * Although commands are not case sensitive, we advise you to write exactly “User-agent”, that is all lowercase except for the capitalized “U”.

I rest my case! hein?

]]> By: Gothic http://blog.centopeia.com/2006/01/24/bricolage-1100-is-out/#comment-685 Gothic Tue, 24 Jan 2006 15:47:47 +0000 http://blog.centopeia.com/?p=68#comment-685 Try here: http://tool.motoricerca.info/robots-checker.phtml " http://www.sapo.pt/robots.txt " :-) Try here: http://tool.motoricerca.info/robots-checker.phtml

” http://www.sapo.pt/robots.txt “

:-)

]]> By: Pedro http://blog.centopeia.com/2006/01/24/bricolage-1100-is-out/#comment-684 Pedro Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:51:50 +0000 http://blog.centopeia.com/?p=68#comment-684 About the robots.txt, I just read the following on the http://www.robotstxt.org/ : <blockquote>"The file consists of one or more records separated by one or more blank lines (terminated by CR,CR/NL, or NL). Each record contains lines of the form ":". <strong>The field name is case insensitive</strong>."</blockquote> so it might not be an error or non standard complaint, correct? About the robots.txt, I just read the following on the http://www.robotstxt.org/ :

“The file consists of one or more records separated by one or more blank lines (terminated by CR,CR/NL, or NL). Each record contains lines of the form “:”. The field name is case insensitive.”

so it might not be an error or non standard complaint, correct?

]]> By: Pedro http://blog.centopeia.com/2006/01/24/bricolage-1100-is-out/#comment-683 Pedro Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:31:58 +0000 http://blog.centopeia.com/?p=68#comment-683 Thanks for the notes! :O About we're still using an older version, we still have some legacy systems that required or at least delayed our migration to new versions, but we will. And probably jump for the 1.10 already. :) Thanks for the notes! :O
About we’re still using an older version, we still have some legacy systems that required or at least delayed our migration to new versions, but we will. And probably jump for the 1.10 already. :)

]]> By: Gothic http://blog.centopeia.com/2006/01/24/bricolage-1100-is-out/#comment-682 Gothic Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:28:50 +0000 http://blog.centopeia.com/?p=68#comment-682 Outra coisa.. pelo que vejo o www.SAPO.pt ainda usa a versão 1.8.0, e a 1.8.9 estável já saiu à muito.. já deviam actualizar =) Outra coisa.. pelo que vejo o http://www.SAPO.pt ainda usa a versão 1.8.0, e a 1.8.9 estável já saiu à muito.. já deviam actualizar =)

]]> By: Gothic http://blog.centopeia.com/2006/01/24/bricolage-1100-is-out/#comment-681 Gothic Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:22:54 +0000 http://blog.centopeia.com/?p=68#comment-681 http://ajuda.sapo.pt/ -> Vê o título desta página... está repetido! Já agora o http://www.sapo.pt/robots.txt não está dentro do standard.. é "User-agent" e não "User-Agent". Boa continuação... http://ajuda.sapo.pt/ -> Vê o título desta página… está repetido!

Já agora o http://www.sapo.pt/robots.txt não está dentro do standard.. é “User-agent” e não “User-Agent”.

Boa continuação…

]]>