<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lisbon scores 2nd in the NYTimes 53 Places to go in 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.centopeia.com/2008/02/11/lisbon-scores-2nd-in-the-nytimes-53-places-to-go-in-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.centopeia.com/2008/02/11/lisbon-scores-2nd-in-the-nytimes-53-places-to-go-in-2008/</link>
	<description>Ramblings about digital life</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: André Luís</title>
		<link>http://blog.centopeia.com/2008/02/11/lisbon-scores-2nd-in-the-nytimes-53-places-to-go-in-2008/#comment-37321</link>
		<dc:creator>André Luís</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.centopeia.com/2008/02/11/lisbon-scores-2nd-in-the-nytimes-53-places-to-go-in-2008/#comment-37321</guid>
		<description>Wow! Is it me or does The NY Times have a fetish for Lisbon? It's not the first time we have our city mentioned in their website/publication, if my memory doesn't fail me.

Moreover, it's impressive to see they're actually pretty current... that Fontana Park hotel wasn't completed until only a few weeks ago. They also got the future well covered... Outstanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow! Is it me or does The NY Times have a fetish for Lisbon? It&#8217;s not the first time we have our city mentioned in their website/publication, if my memory doesn&#8217;t fail me.</p>
<p>Moreover, it&#8217;s impressive to see they&#8217;re actually pretty current&#8230; that Fontana Park hotel wasn&#8217;t completed until only a few weeks ago. They also got the future well covered&#8230; Outstanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 2.077 seconds -->
